containers — Engineering Performance
8 engineers all time · May 2025 – Jun 2026 · built 2026-09-30 · GitHub
Performance snapshot
Today's rolling 90-day reading for containers, compared with the start of the series. Pick a window to move that comparison point.
Avg. perf / dev / mo
−100.0%
0.43 → 0.00 ETV
Active engineers
−100.0%
5.0 → 0.0
Features
−23.8pp
23.8% → 0.0%
Performance Composition
Each month's output split by type of work: Features (new value), Maintenance (sustaining systems), Tests, Docs, and Fixes (rework). The yellow line is output per engineer, so when it rises each engineer is delivering more, whatever the team size did. Unit: Engineering Throughput Value (ETV).
Engineering capacity
Effective engineers behind containers, against its pre-AI baseline. Each subject has its own: containers's is 0.43 ETV / dev / mo, its first reading in Q2 2025. Per-engineer ETV divided by that gives a capacity multiple, and that multiple applied to the engineers active in the trailing 90 days turns it into engineer-equivalents. The line is the real headcount, so the gap between line and area is what the leverage is worth. Because each baseline is its own, every subject opens at 1.0x on its first day: multiples measure improvement and are not comparable between subjects.
Knowledge concentration
How dependent is this repo on a small number of engineers? Higher top-1 share = higher key-person risk.
Gabi owns 62.3 % of commits.
Behind the numbers
Written summary of the work completed each month.
No monthly reports available yet.
Most impactful commits
Top 10 by ETV in the all-time window.
- 2.1ETVInitial pass at Container classMike Nomitch · 541ce590 · 2025-05-04
- 0.7ETVRefactoringMike Nomitch · 29beb04b · 2025-06-18
- 0.6ETVrefactor container class 1. fix type issues 2. fix alarm not triggering issue 3. simplifying some pathsGabi Villalonga Simon · e786c4ea · 2025-05-16
- 0.4ETVAdd basic e2e tests (#80) * Version Packages * add basic local fixture tests * add github action to run tests on PRs * delete redundant node example --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>emily-shen · 66cfba14 · 2025-09-08
- 0.4ETVcontainers: tighten up all catch() paths in main monitor tracking of the container There would be cases that the customer would see a 'running' container on an unknown monitor error when in reality it was stopped already.Gabi Villalonga Simon · 19c17099 · 2026-05-26
- 0.4ETVexperimental outbound interceptionGabi Villalonga Simon · ae166c7f · 2026-02-28
- 0.3ETVAdd interceptHttps option to allow intercepting HTTPS via Workers and add allowed/denied Hosts optionGabi Villalonga Simon · 9b32add7 · 2026-04-03
- 0.3ETVTemporarily throwing errors based on retry count and not time or abort signal - Surfaces error better - Does not autostart a container in constructor, so we can throw error nicely Generally working though hacky Update error response TweaksMike Nomitch · ae686092 · 2025-06-18
- 0.3ETVadd params to set handlers, and remember last setOutbound callGabi Villalonga Simon · b7a06f46 · 2026-03-10
- 0.3ETVtrack container state in 'ctx.storage' so we can trigger hooks that guarantee atleast once delivery We are also introducing a monitor() call when the container is running and there is not an existing one.Gabi Villalonga Simon · 1b87bdbe · 2025-05-19