Navigara
Meta

fresco — Engineering Performance

12 engineers all time · Jan 2025 – Aug 2026 · built 2026-08-23 · GitHub

Performance snapshot

Today's rolling 90-day reading for fresco, compared with the start of the series. Pick a window to move that comparison point.

Eff. capacity added

−2.9engineers

4 devs deliver like 1 (0.3x pre-AI)

Avg. perf / dev / mo (ETV)

+28.2%

0.19 → 0.24

Active engineers

−33.3%

6.0 → 4.0

Features

+3.5pp

40.9% → 44.4%

fresco vs. Meta

Per-engineer ETV for fresco against Meta as a whole. Both lines are 90-day rolling averages scaled to a 30-day month, so they share one axis and can be read against each other at any point. Pick a window to zoom the chart to it.

fresco
0.24ETV / dev / mo
+0.06 (+33.3%) past 90d
Meta
1.36ETV / dev / mo
+0.17 (+14.3%) past 90d

Performance over time

ETV stacked by Features / Maintenance / Tests / Docs / Fixes — 90-day moving average, normalized to ETV / month.

Engineering capacity

Effective engineers behind fresco, in pre-AI terms. Per-engineer ETV divided by the Q1 2025 baseline of 0.86 ETV / dev / mo gives a capacity multiple, and that multiple applied to the engineers active in the trailing 90 days turns it into engineer-equivalents. The line is the real headcount, so the gap between line and area is what the leverage is worth.

Effective engineers
1engineer-equivalents
−3 engineers above real headcount
Real engineers
4engineers
active in the trailing 90 days
Capacity vs pre-AI
0.3x
per engineer, vs 0.86 ETV / dev / mo

Knowledge concentration

How dependent is this repo on a small number of engineers? Higher top-1 share = higher key-person risk.

Top 1
30.3 %
Top 3
65.0 %
Top 5
82.9 %

generatedunixname537391475639613 owns 30.3 % of commits.

Reports

Written summary of the work completed each month.

No monthly reports available yet.

Top engineers

Most impactful commits

Top 10 by ETV in the all-time window.