Navigara
Meta

pyrefly — Engineering Performance

31 engineers all time · Jan 2025 – Aug 2026 · built 2026-08-23 · GitHub

Performance snapshot

Today's rolling 90-day reading for pyrefly, compared with the start of the series. Pick a window to move that comparison point.

Eff. capacity added

+42.8engineers

18 devs deliver like 61 (3.4x pre-AI)

Avg. perf / dev / mo (ETV)

+123.3%

1.30 → 2.91

Active engineers

+12.5%

16.0 → 18.0

Features

−0.5pp

31.8% → 31.3%

pyrefly vs. Meta

Per-engineer ETV for pyrefly against Meta as a whole. Both lines are 90-day rolling averages scaled to a 30-day month, so they share one axis and can be read against each other at any point. Pick a window to zoom the chart to it.

pyrefly
2.91ETV / dev / mo
+0.48 (+19.8%) past 90d
Meta
1.36ETV / dev / mo
+0.17 (+14.3%) past 90d

Performance over time

ETV stacked by Features / Maintenance / Tests / Docs / Fixes — 90-day moving average, normalized to ETV / month.

Engineering capacity

Effective engineers behind pyrefly, in pre-AI terms. Per-engineer ETV divided by the Q1 2025 baseline of 0.86 ETV / dev / mo gives a capacity multiple, and that multiple applied to the engineers active in the trailing 90 days turns it into engineer-equivalents. The line is the real headcount, so the gap between line and area is what the leverage is worth.

Effective engineers
61engineer-equivalents
+43 engineers above real headcount
Real engineers
18engineers
active in the trailing 90 days
Capacity vs pre-AI
3.4x
per engineer, vs 0.86 ETV / dev / mo

Knowledge concentration

How dependent is this repo on a small number of engineers? Higher top-1 share = higher key-person risk.

Top 1
18.5 %
Top 3
49.2 %
Top 5
63.7 %

Steven Troxler owns 18.5 % of commits.

Reports

Written summary of the work completed each month.

No monthly reports available yet.

Most impactful commits

Top 10 by ETV in the all-time window.