Navigara

github.com-google-guava

all · 3 devs · built 2026-06-13

Repository snapshot

Performance · 90d

37.1ETV

+233.0% since Q2 2025

ETV / dev / mo

2.1ETV

2 devs · 30-day window

Last 7 days · per dev

0.3ETV

per developer per week

Work mix

Growth2%· 2.2Maintenance91%· 94.7Fixes7%· 7.2
104.2 ETV all-time412 commits3 all-time devsJan 2025 – Jun 2026

Monthly reports

  • Highlights

    Observations

    • Overall commit volume decreased by 46% (32 commits this month vs 59-commit 2-month average).
    • Total output score dropped by 65% (7 this month vs 21-score 2-month average), indicating a substantial reduction in impactful changes.
    • Maintenance score decreased by 64% (7 this month vs 19-score 2-month average), aligning with the overall reduction in activity.
    • The grow score remained at 0, consistent with the 2-month average, indicating no new feature development or significant enhancements contributing to this metric.
    • The waste score was 0 this month, representing a 92% decrease compared to the 1-score 2-month average, suggesting highly focused and effective changes without rework.
    • Development activity was almost exclusively focused on *maintenance* and *refactoring*, with 31 out of 32 commits explicitly categorized as maintenance or having zero grow/waste scores, highlighting a period of internal consolidation.
    • A strong pattern of *code quality* improvements was observed, including addressing static analysis warnings (Error Prone, nullness annotations) and removing redundant code elements (e.g., `final` keywords in [1d5c444f · cpovirk], redundant annotations in [6f3f85df · cpovirk]).
    • Significant investment was made in *test infrastructure* and *platform compatibility*, with updates for Android emulators, migration from Mockito, and expanded J2KT/Native test coverage.
    • Despite a commit ([6296a954 · Kurt Alfred Kluever]) introducing a new capability for *BloomFilter* robustness, it did not contribute to the overall grow score, indicating that the metric might not capture all forms of 'growth' or that its impact was deemed minor by the scoring system.

Performance over time

ETV stacked by Growth, Maintenance and Fixes — 90-day moving average, normalized to ETV / month.

Average performance per developer

ETV per active developer per month — 30-day moving average.

Active developers over time

Unique developers committing each day — 90-day moving average.

Knowledge concentration

How dependent is this repo on a small number of contributors? Higher top-1 share = higher key-person risk.

Top 1
88.6 %
Top 3
100.0 %
Top 5
100.0 %

cpovirk owns 88.6 % of commits.

Most impactful commits

Top 20 by ETV in the all-time window.