Navigara
Vercel

vercel — Engineering Performance

46 engineers all time · Jan 2025 – Aug 2026 · built 2026-08-23 · GitHub

Performance snapshot

Today's rolling 90-day reading for vercel, compared with the start of the series. Pick a window to move that comparison point.

Eff. capacity added

+1.4engineers

24 devs deliver like 25 (1.1x pre-AI)

Avg. perf / dev / mo (ETV)

+391.1%

0.19 → 0.91

Active engineers

+60.0%

15.0 → 24.0

Features

+15.4pp

28.3% → 43.7%

vercel vs. Vercel

Per-engineer ETV for vercel against Vercel as a whole. Both lines are 90-day rolling averages scaled to a 30-day month, so they share one axis and can be read against each other at any point. Pick a window to zoom the chart to it.

vercel
0.91ETV / dev / mo
0.31 (25.4%) past 90d
Vercel
4.09ETV / dev / mo
+0.81 (+24.7%) past 90d

Performance over time

ETV stacked by Features / Maintenance / Tests / Docs / Fixes — 90-day moving average, normalized to ETV / month.

Engineering capacity

Effective engineers behind vercel, in pre-AI terms. Per-engineer ETV divided by the Q1 2025 baseline of 0.86 ETV / dev / mo gives a capacity multiple, and that multiple applied to the engineers active in the trailing 90 days turns it into engineer-equivalents. The line is the real headcount, so the gap between line and area is what the leverage is worth.

Effective engineers
25engineer-equivalents
+1 engineers above real headcount
Real engineers
24engineers
active in the trailing 90 days
Capacity vs pre-AI
1.1x
per engineer, vs 0.86 ETV / dev / mo

Knowledge concentration

How dependent is this repo on a small number of engineers? Higher top-1 share = higher key-person risk.

Top 1
15.2 %
Top 3
30.3 %
Top 5
41.0 %

Jeff See owns 15.2 % of commits.

Reports

Written summary of the work completed each month.

No monthly reports available yet.

Most impactful commits

Top 10 by ETV in the all-time window.