amazon-ecs-agent — Engineering Performance
3 engineers all time · Jan 2025 – Aug 2026 · built 2026-09-10 · GitHub
Performance snapshot
Today's rolling 90-day reading for amazon-ecs-agent, compared with the start of the series. Pick a window to move that comparison point.
Avg. perf / dev / mo
−20.9%
0.15 → 0.12 ETV
Active engineers
±0%
3.0 → 3.0
Features
+16.2pp
11.2% → 27.4%
vs. AWS
0.14x
0.45x → 0.14x · −86% below
amazon-ecs-agent vs. AWS
Per-engineer ETV for amazon-ecs-agent against AWS as a whole. Both lines are 90-day rolling averages scaled to a 30-day month, so they share one axis and can be read against each other at any point. Pick a window to zoom the chart to it.
Performance Composition
Each month's output split by type of work: Features (new value), Maintenance (sustaining systems), Tests, Docs, and Fixes (rework). The yellow line is output per engineer, so when it rises each engineer is delivering more, whatever the team size did. Unit: Engineering Throughput Value (ETV).
Engineering capacity
Effective engineers behind amazon-ecs-agent, against its pre-AI baseline. Each subject has its own: amazon-ecs-agent's is 0.15 ETV / dev / mo, its first reading in Q1 2025. Per-engineer ETV divided by that gives a capacity multiple, and that multiple applied to the engineers active in the trailing 90 days turns it into engineer-equivalents. The line is the real headcount, so the gap between line and area is what the leverage is worth. Because each baseline is its own, every subject opens at 1.0x on its first day: multiples measure improvement and are not comparable between subjects.
Knowledge concentration
How dependent is this repo on a small number of engineers? Higher top-1 share = higher key-person risk.
Amogh Rathore owns 45.7 % of commits.
Behind the numbers
Written summary of the work completed each month.
No monthly reports available yet.
Most impactful commits
Top 10 by ETV in the all-time window.
- 1.2ETVInitialize IP Comaptibility config before service clients are created (#4568)Amogh Rathore · 5e47ab86 · 2025-04-14
- 0.8ETVBlock access to introspection for all connections other than loopback and docker0 interfacesmye956 · 84739873 · 2025-05-23
- 0.6ETVLatency and packet loss faults should apply to all network interfaces (#4671)Amogh Rathore · 88fd42b2 · 2025-06-05
- 0.5ETVIPv6 detection (#4561)Amogh Rathore · 6a41da89 · 2025-04-09
- 0.5ETVRoute for TMDS access on host mode on IPv6-only instances (#4633)Amogh Rathore · f507a397 · 2025-05-14
- 0.5ETVmigrating SSM client over to AWS SDK Go V2 conusming SSM client changes fix unit tests removing commented out codemye956 · 4993dd10 · 2025-03-27
- 0.5ETVNetwork bindings for IPv6-only instances (#4651)Amogh Rathore · ef1bfd56 · 2025-05-27
- 0.5ETVAdd support for IPv6-only environments to exec agent (#4708)Amogh Rathore · efa1f457 · 2025-07-28
- 0.5ETVDetermine the fluentd async option based on Docker server version Docker's fluentd log driver supports passing an "async" option. The "fluentd-async-connect" option was deprecated in Docker v20.10.0 and completely removed in v28.0.0. Reference: https://docs.docker.com/engine/deprecated/#fluentd-async-connect-log-opt Functionally, both options are equivalent, see: https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/39086. Since Docker's refactor of the fluentd async option was not versioned and affects all API versions, we need to determine the appropriate option using the Docker Server version, in order to be backwards compatible.Anuj Singh · 1a770f8d · 2025-04-03
- 0.5ETVRestrict daemon-bridge introspection to the daemon namespace (#5068)Amogh Rathore · fc359200 · 2026-07-29