Navigara

github.com-cloudflare-workerd

all · 63 devs · built 2026-06-13

Repository snapshot

Performance · 90d

44.5ETV

+16.0% since Q2 2025

ETV / dev / mo

0.1ETV

5 devs · 30-day window

Last 7 days · per dev

ETV

per developer per week

Work mix

Growth35%· 150.7Maintenance39%· 171.7Fixes26%· 112.4
434.8 ETV all-time3,114 commits63 all-time devsJan 2025 – Jun 2026

Monthly reports

  • Highlights

    Observations

    • Overall development activity experienced a severe decline across all metrics compared to the 2-month average: total output was down 89% (4 vs 36), grow score down 84% (3 vs 15), maintenance score down 93% (1 vs 13), waste score down 92% (1 vs 7), and commit volume down 78% (75 vs 346).
    • A significant portion of the listed commits (23 out of 50 detailed) were routine 'Release YYYY-MM-DD' commits, which are automated updates to `maximum-compatibility-date.txt` and `release-version.txt` in `src/workerd/io/`, contributing to the maintenance count but representing minimal substantive work.
    • Many commits categorized as 'grow' or 'maintenance' in their summaries, such as those adding new type definitions, reported `grow: 0, maint: 0, waste: 0` scores, indicating that the actual code changes contributing to these metrics were extremely limited for the majority of the 75 commits.
    • Rework was observed in the *Workflows module* where type definitions for a *step rollback* feature were introduced in [bb40bdd3 · vaish] and then subsequently reverted in [3692eac7 · Caio Nogueira], suggesting a change in feature direction or implementation issues.
    • A waste commit [cc8a10ad · samscott89] was dedicated to fixing incorrect *type definitions* for *chat-completions models*, indicating prior inaccurate type scaffolding.
    • Another waste commit [76a2522b · Harris Hancock] addressed a *source-breaking API change* in the `capnp-cpp` library, highlighting overhead associated with adapting to external dependency updates.

Performance over time

ETV stacked by Growth, Maintenance and Fixes — 90-day moving average, normalized to ETV / month.

Average performance per developer

ETV per active developer per month — 30-day moving average.

Active developers over time

Unique developers committing each day — 90-day moving average.

Knowledge concentration

How dependent is this repo on a small number of contributors? Higher top-1 share = higher key-person risk.

Top 1
16.5 %
Top 3
37.3 %
Top 5
49.9 %

James M Snell owns 16.5 % of commits.

Most impactful commits

Top 20 by ETV in the all-time window.