Navigara
All Organizations

Cloudflare — Engineering Performance

CloudflareEngineering capacity
+306engineers above headcount

99 engineers now deliver what 405 would have in Q1 2025.

Effective engineersReal engineers
Apr 2025Dec 2025Sep 2026
Where the work wentBiggest shift: Docs down 12 points
Features30%Maintenance12%Tests32%Docs14%Fixes12%

Performance snapshot

Today's rolling 90-day reading for Cloudflare, compared with the start of the series. Pick a window to move that comparison point.

Avg. perf / dev / mo

+309.5%

0.42 → 1.72 ETV

Active engineers

−19.5%

123.0 → 99.0

Features

+2.3pp

27.5% → 29.8%

vs. 500 OSS index

0.45x

0.46x → 0.45x · −55% below

Engineering capacity

Effective engineers behind Cloudflare, against its pre-AI baseline. Each subject has its own: Cloudflare's is 0.42 ETV / dev / mo, its first reading in Q1 2025. Per-engineer ETV divided by that gives a capacity multiple, and that multiple applied to the engineers active in the trailing 90 days turns it into engineer-equivalents. The line is the real headcount, so the gap between line and area is what the leverage is worth. Because each baseline is its own, every subject opens at 1.0x on its first day: multiples measure improvement and are not comparable between subjects.

Effective engineers
405engineer-equivalents
+306 engineers above real headcount
Real engineers
99engineers
active in the trailing 90 days
Capacity vs pre-AI
4.1x
per engineer, vs 0.42 pre-AI

Cloudflare vs. 500 OSS Performance Index

Per-engineer ETV for Cloudflare against the pooled 500 OSS Performance Index. Both lines are 90-day rolling averages scaled to a 30-day month, so they share one axis and can be read against each other at any point. Pick a window to zoom the chart to it. Latest reading: Cloudflare is 55% below the index (1.72 vs 3.85 ETV/dev/mo). At the start of the tracked period the gap was 54% below.

Cloudflare
1.72ETV / dev / mo
+0.70 (+68.6%) past 90d
500 OSS Performance Index
3.85ETV / dev / mo
+1.66 (+75.8%) past 90d

Behind the numbers

Aug

Written summary of the work completed each month.

During August 2026, the team focused extensively on webstreams parity, test infrastructure consolidation, and OpenAPI specification alignment across 530 commits. Total output remained steady and in line with the recent run rate, marked by an 80% increase in Tests score compared to the 5-month average alongside candidate-material drops in Features (-37%) and Fixes (-49%).

Highlights

Observations

  • Tests score rose to 46 (+80% above the 25-point 5-month average), driven by new test suites and stream verification hardening such as 620e9071 (James) and 4d64d5b0 (James).
  • Features score dropped 37% relative to the 5-month average (21 vs 33), while Maintenance increased 36% (14 vs 10 5-month average), reflecting an operational shift toward release housekeeping (8865ba50 (Workers), cb5785a0 (Workers)) and schema hygiene.
  • Fixes score decreased 49% from the 5-month average (9 vs 17 5-month average), with bug fixes primarily resolving stream edge cases like parked BYOB reads in 6b1f619f (James) and schema corrections in 401ea427 (cloudflare-schema-publisher[bot)].
  • Commit volume reached 530 (+42% compared to the 373-commit 5-month average), with a large proportion of changes concentrated in OpenAPI definition files.

Based on 530 commits42.9 ETVUpdated Sep 30, 2026, 4:01 PM

Repositories

Where each repository stands: average performance per engineer per month over the last 90 days, with the rolling 90-day curve behind it. The range picks the window (past 90d): it sets how much of the curve you see, the Δ across it, and the span the work mix is measured over. Ranked highest first.

agents

Avg performance

10.77 ETV

per engineer per month

Avg. dev performance / month (90-day MA)

+22.8%

Work mix

Features

30%

Maint

9%

Tests

39%

Docs

8%

Fixes

15%

4 devs129 ETV+2576% since Q2 2025Repository report

sandbox-sdk

Avg performance

2.36 ETV

per engineer per month

Avg. dev performance / month (90-day MA)

+31.1%

Work mix

Features

43%

Maint

9%

Tests

30%

Docs

11%

Fixes

7%

3 devs21 ETV+380% since Q2 2025Repository report

workerd

Avg performance

1.75 ETV

per engineer per month

Avg. dev performance / month (90-day MA)

+1237.5%

Work mix

Features

32%

Maint

8%

Tests

40%

Docs

6%

Fixes

14%

29 devs152 ETV−75% since Q2 2025Repository report

workers-sdk

Avg performance

1.13 ETV

per engineer per month

Avg. dev performance / month (90-day MA)

+30.3%

Work mix

Features

27%

Maint

20%

Tests

34%

Docs

7%

Fixes

11%

28 devs95 ETV+64% since Q2 2025Repository report

pingora

Avg performance

1.04 ETV

per engineer per month

Avg. dev performance / month (90-day MA)

-17.9%

Work mix

Features

45%

Maint

25%

Tests

16%

Docs

1%

Fixes

13%

4 devs19 ETV+84% since Q2 2025Repository report

cloudflared

Avg performance

1.00 ETV

per engineer per month

Avg. dev performance / month (90-day MA)

+624.8%

Work mix

Features

10%

Maint

17%

Tests

53%

Docs

6%

Fixes

14%

1 dev3 ETV+47% since Q2 2025Repository report

foundations

Avg performance

0.68 ETV

per engineer per month

Avg. dev performance / month (90-day MA)

-29.3%

Work mix

Features

82%

Maint

14%

Tests

2%

Docs

2%

Fixes

0%

2 devs4 ETV+2639472% since Q2 2025Repository report

cloudflare-docs

Avg performance

0.44 ETV

per engineer per month

Avg. dev performance / month (90-day MA)

+16.5%

Work mix

Features

20%

Maint

15%

Tests

8%

Docs

51%

Fixes

7%

64 devs84 ETV+72% since Q2 2025Repository report

workers-rs

Avg performance

0.26 ETV

per engineer per month

Avg. dev performance / month (90-day MA)

-36.4%

Work mix

Features

50%

Maint

9%

Tests

18%

Docs

4%

Fixes

19%

3 devs2 ETV+102% since Q2 2025Repository report

telescope

Avg performance

0.20 ETV

per engineer per month

Avg. dev performance / month (90-day MA)

+100.0%

Work mix

Features

25%

Maint

13%

Tests

16%

Docs

12%

Fixes

34%

1 dev1 ETV−62% since Q4 2025Repository report

Performance Composition

Each month's output split by type of work: Features (new value), Maintenance (sustaining systems), Tests, Docs, and Fixes (rework). The yellow line is output per engineer, so when it rises each engineer is delivering more, whatever the team size did. Unit: Engineering Throughput Value (ETV).

Cost per Performance Unit

−76%

If performance per engineer more than doubled, each unit of engineering performance now costs approximately 76% less than at the baseline 90-day window (ending 2025-04-01). Treat this as a direction, not a price: the exact figure depends on fully-loaded engineer cost, but which way it moved is not in doubt.

Effective Capacity Added

+306 engineers

At today's productivity, the current 99-person team delivers the performance equivalent of 405 engineers at the baseline 90-day rolling window (ending 2025-04-01). That's roughly 306 engineers worth of capacity added through productivity gains, not hiring.

CapEx vs OpEx

Each month's work split two ways. CapEx (capitalizable investment) is the work that builds the asset: Features, plus the Tests that prove it works and the Docs that explain it. OpEx (operating expense) is keeping it running: Maintenance and Fixes. The yellow line is the CapEx share, so a rising line means more of the month went into building new rather than sustaining what exists. Unit: Engineering Throughput Value (ETV).

Hours per Repository

Trailing 90-day window (64 working days). Org-level capacity is allocated to each repo by its share of org performance, then split CapEx / OpEx by that repo's own Features + Tests + Docs vs Maintenance + Fixes mix.

foundations
CapEx %
86.1%
OpEx %
13.9%
sandbox-sdk
CapEx %
83.9%
OpEx %
16.1%
cloudflare-docs
CapEx %
78.2%
OpEx %
21.8%
workerd
CapEx %
78.0%
OpEx %
22.0%
agents
CapEx %
77.0%
OpEx %
23.0%
workers-rs
CapEx %
71.4%
OpEx %
28.6%
cloudflared
CapEx %
68.9%
OpEx %
31.1%
workers-sdk
CapEx %
68.8%
OpEx %
31.2%
pingora
CapEx %
62.1%
OpEx %
37.9%
telescope
CapEx %
52.5%
OpEx %
47.5%
Total
CapEx %
75.7%
OpEx %
24.3%

Feature Contribution

Who shipped each month's new feature work, as a share of that month's total. Bands of similar width mean new value is coming from across the team; one band that stays wide means most of it rests on the same person. Named engineers shipped the most Features over the period. Everyone else is grouped as Others.

Quarterly Summary

Engineers and the Features / Maintenance / Tests / Docs / Fixes mix for each quarter. Cost / Perf Unit is what one unit of performance costs against Q2'25. Engineers vs headcount is measured against this org's own pre-AI baseline instead, its first reading in the index, so it agrees with the capacity tile and chart above.

Q2'25—
Engineers
134
Cost / Perf Unit
0%
Engineers vs headcount
+36 engineers
Work mix
29% Features
Q3'25+11%
Engineers
145
Cost / Perf Unit
−2%
Engineers vs headcount
+43 engineers
Work mix
32% Features
Q4'25−3%
Engineers
140
Cost / Perf Unit
−3%
Engineers vs headcount
+42 engineers
Work mix
28% Features
Q1'26+65%
Engineers
148
Cost / Perf Unit
−38%
Engineers vs headcount
+152 engineers
Work mix
36% Features
Q2'26+13%
Engineers
136
Cost / Perf Unit
−49%
Engineers vs headcount
+202 engineers
Work mix
28% Features