Navigara
Google

skia — Engineering Performance

23 engineers all time · Jan 2025 – Aug 2026 · built 2026-08-23 · GitHub

Performance snapshot

Today's rolling 90-day reading for skia, compared with the start of the series. Pick a window to move that comparison point.

Eff. capacity added

+6.5engineers

13 devs deliver like 19 (1.5x pre-AI)

Avg. perf / dev / mo (ETV)

+55.9%

0.83 → 1.29

Active engineers

−38.1%

21.0 → 13.0

Features

+2.9pp

25.8% → 28.7%

skia vs. Google

Per-engineer ETV for skia against Google as a whole. Both lines are 90-day rolling averages scaled to a 30-day month, so they share one axis and can be read against each other at any point. Pick a window to zoom the chart to it.

skia
1.29ETV / dev / mo
+0.16 (+14.2%) past 90d
Google
2.05ETV / dev / mo
+0.66 (+47.5%) past 90d

Performance over time

ETV stacked by Features / Maintenance / Tests / Docs / Fixes — 90-day moving average, normalized to ETV / month.

Engineering capacity

Effective engineers behind skia, in pre-AI terms. Per-engineer ETV divided by the Q1 2025 baseline of 0.86 ETV / dev / mo gives a capacity multiple, and that multiple applied to the engineers active in the trailing 90 days turns it into engineer-equivalents. The line is the real headcount, so the gap between line and area is what the leverage is worth.

Effective engineers
19engineer-equivalents
+6 engineers above real headcount
Real engineers
13engineers
active in the trailing 90 days
Capacity vs pre-AI
1.5x
per engineer, vs 0.86 ETV / dev / mo

Knowledge concentration

How dependent is this repo on a small number of engineers? Higher top-1 share = higher key-person risk.

Top 1
18.6 %
Top 3
42.9 %
Top 5
59.3 %

Kaylee Lubick owns 18.6 % of commits.

Reports

Written summary of the work completed each month.

No monthly reports available yet.

Most impactful commits

Top 10 by ETV in the all-time window.